Letter Template For Follow-Up On Writing Competition

Hey there! If you've participated in a writing competition recently, you're probably eager to know the results. Following up with the organizers is a great way to express your enthusiasm while also showing your professionalism. In this article, well explore how to craft the perfect follow-up letter to ensure your voice is heard. So, lets dive in and discover how you can make your follow-up stand out!

Image cover: Letter Template For Follow-Up On Writing Competition

Signature and contact information

For participants in writing competitions, following up can be crucial for networking and feedback. A concise follow-up email can reiterate interest and professionalism. Including the name of the competition, date of submission, and any relevant entry details enhances clarity. Providing a brief overview of the submitted work, such as genre or themes explored, can prompt recall among organizers. To conclude, include a polite request for any updates regarding the competition outcome. Additionally, ensure to add a formal closing signature with your full name, contact details (email and phone number), and any relevant links to your writing portfolio or social media.

Clarity of the inquiry

A follow-up on a writing competition may include clarification regarding submission guidelines, judging criteria, or announcement dates. For example, inquiries could pertain to particular themes or word counts specified in the competition rules. Additionally, participants often seek information about the panel of judges, composed of renowned authors or literary critics. Updates on when winners will be announced, usually several weeks post-submission, can also be a point of interest. Clear communication is essential to ensure all participants understand the competition expectations and timelines.

Reference to original submission

A follow-up on a writing competition may include details such as the competition name, submission date, and specific work titled. For instance, an author may refer to "The Annual National Writing Competition 2023," highlighting the original submission date of March 15, 2023, for a short story titled "Echoes of Tomorrow." This story, centered on the themes of time travel and nostalgia, showcases innovative narrative techniques. Participants often eagerly await feedback for future projects and opportunities within similar competitions, such as "The Global Literary Contest 2023," offering networking with renowned authors and literary agents. A timely inquiry can clarify the status of entries and enhance community engagement among aspiring writers.

Expression of continued interest

A follow-up on a writing competition can express continued interest in the results and appreciation for the opportunity. Participants often eagerly await announcements regarding winners or feedback. Notable competitions, like the Bridport Prize or the Writer's Digest Annual Writing Competition, typically generate significant excitement among writers gathering submissions from diverse genres. The timeframe for results varies, from a few weeks to several months, depending on the specific event. Maintaining communication shows enthusiasm and professionalism, valuable traits for writers aspiring to connect with literary communities or publishing opportunities. Recognition from esteemed competitions can lead to further avenues in a writer's career, increasing visibility and credibility within the industry.

Deadline for expected response

Inquiring about the outcome of the recent writing competition can often be a thoughtful yet necessary step for eager participants. Many competitions, such as the 2023 Annual Writers' Contest held in New York City, typically conclude submission phases by a specified date, often set around mid-July. After this deadline, organizers often indicate a timeframe for notification, which could range from four to six weeks post-judging, providing clarity for entrants anxious to learn about their submissions. A polite follow-up can express continued interest, respect for the judges' deliberation process, as well as a desire for feedback, thus establishing a professional rapport with the organizing committee.